
Originally Posted by
PeeJay
Why don't you read my posts you tedious little fool? I underlined that I was selecting players who have
been top notch for the whole decade.
No need for insults the players i mentioned were great the whole decade
Veron in his day was better than all of those players with the exception of Zidane who, however, retired
in 2006.
Hargreaves > Vieira.
Also, Hargreaves has hardly done anything? How about two Champions Leagues, one at the age of 20?
Fair play to that
Hargreaves has won two Champions League finals, more than Scholes (missed '99), Gerrard, Lampard,
Makelele, Vieira, Keane, Xavi (missed '05) and Zidane. Of the players you mentioned, only Deco has won
two Champions Leagues, but, let's be honest, he only had 3-4 years of quality, before and after that
phase he was average.
its not about the trophies its about the quality of football the player produced
so what if Lampard did not win a UCL ? he was named the Premier league player of the decade he broke records with Chelsea and won 2 league tittles and scored in a champions league final
and so what if Xavi missed a champions league final ? he won many other stuff and was named the best player at the euro 2008 and Deco was quality from 2003 tell he joined Chelsea but he is not that bad wit Chelsea
Gerrard played in 2 champions league finals and scored a goal in one of them and had a decade of great football
Scholes was one of our best players in 2007 and he was 33, he had a quality decade
Keegan named him the best english midfield and said that "Scholes is absoloute world class player"
Edgar Davies said the he is the best midfielder in the world
he broke records like becoming the best english scorer in the UCL and won 6 league tittles 1 champions league tittle
Hargreaves had 7 years of good football in his 3 years at United he was injured for most of the time and even when he was fit in his first season Fergie used Carrick and Anderson/Scholes more than Hargreaves
Makelele was a good player in his day but remember that he was 30 in 2003, meaning that he spent
most of his bright years in the 90s. Keane? Decent player, not in the last decade though, considering
he retired in 2005.
Best days in the 90's ooh c'mon Peejay his finest time was with Real Madrid nad ti was in the early 2000's nad he was Chelsea's best played in the mid 00's
Zidane praised him and called him the battery of real madird and almost every manager gave him praise
his best days where in the 00's and it was the time he established himself as a regular for France national team
Samuel > Rio. Stam is 38 years of age and did a good job until 2005 or so, that's half a decade, compared
to Samuel who has had a decade of absolute quality.
He's recently won the South American player of the year award for the second time running, he regularly
plays for Argentina instead of Aguero and Riquelme, among others and he broke the British transfer record.
Nobody who saw him at Lazio can doubt his immense quality and absolutely superb passing.
Veron is immense but he wasted hlaf of the decade with United and Chelsea he have been good with Inter and great with Estudiantes
Veron NEVER got picked ahead of Riquelme
by the time Riquelme was playing for Argentina Veron was used a a Central midfielder while Riquelme was used as an attcking midfielder in a 4-5-1 formation with Crespo afont
i watch lots of Brasil and argentina and almost watched every Argentina and Brasil match in the last 3 COPA's (Copa America) and never seen Veron picked ahead of Riquelme
Riquelme retired from interntaional football after a bust up with Diego Maradona thus why Veron plays
and so what if if Veron won the best South American player of the year ? Tevez won it THREE TIMES INA ROW
and speaking of Riquelme did you watch 2007 Copa Libertadores ? i watched allot of it and watched the final because i like Gremio and Riquelme was one of the finest players i ever seen he scored in both legs and was the 2nd best goalscorer and the best player in the tourney
and just like Veron, Riquelme flopped at a big club like Veron did with us and chelsea
can't see one reason why Veron is ahead of Scholes or Zidane ?
Zidane only played 6 years of this decade but Veron only had good 6 years out of 10