I would rather have him over Nasri, if it was for the same price. Although, I'd be over the moon if we could sign any of them.
all these youngsters wants to go to either Barca or Madrid . . . Maybe because they want to play with the best players in the world,bt what they dont understand is that players does'nt make u, but the coach does . . . And who's beta than Fergie. . . No one
20 Mio for s.o. who plays in damn Ligue 1?! The presidents are mental these days when they hear a bigger club is a big interested. 50 Mio Pastore. lmao
You obviously haven't seen Hazard. I would guess whoever gets him will probably need to pay even more than £20m.
Essien Drgoba Lloris Maliuda Ronaldinho Zidane Henry Anelka have all played in Ligue one at one stage or the other, and they haven't done too bad for themselvs. 20 million for Hazard is a fair price, he's a class act
I would definitely be happy to have Hazard if we cannot get Sneijder, Nasri or Modric - even if we had to pay up to £30m for him. He's a class act who has been inspirational for his team and has never been fazed by the European stage. So much potential. He would be a great buy.
He hasn't played on the European stage apart from a few early Europa League rounds. Paying £30 million is absolute madness. I would be happy with signing him but only for £20 million
Theres another lad perfect for the left wing, think his name is Young, hes just gone somewhere in a big money move too... **** these reports linking us with all the wingers, lets have some ball winners pleaaaaaaaaase
At Keano, yes £30m is over the odds but we desperately need someone with that creative talent. Remember I was talking about if we missed out on Modric, Sneijder and Nasri. I would much rather we had one of those three, and Pastore won't be coming here - but this kid really had the ability to be one of the very best. At Noxious - I think he has all the correct tools to play in the centre. He may not be used to that role at the moment but at his age and with his skill he has plenty of time to master it, and I fully believe he would. As I say though, we should explore more proven and experienced talents first. Either of the three more proven names I mentioned would really galvanise us straight away. Hazard would take a little more time to really produce his best.
Hazard as AM >> Hazard as LW. That's not to say he's not good on the wing, he is, he's excellent, but he's better as an AM.