The law does not apply to Steven Gerrard
posted on 24/07/09
Steven Gerrard was today found not guilty of affray at Liverpool Crown Court. The Liverpool captain was accused of attacking Marcus McGee in the Lounge Inn, Southport last December.
I don’t think it’s just me that finds this decision absolutely shocking. The CCTV evidence was clear as day. McGee was elbowed in the face by Gerrard’s friend, then Gerrard followed in with not one, but three uppercuts. How can that possibly be construed as self defence?
Self defence is when a man is attacking you and you strike back to prevent the person from causing you further injury. Did Gerrard think the man was going to assault him on his way to the floor?
This gives people the go ahead to attack innocent people and then claim they thought they were about to be hit. It’s a ridiculous decision but not altogether surprising. The fact that the case was heard in a Liverpool court was a mistake to begin with. how can you possibly find an unbiased jury in a city full of Liverpool fans?
I find it strange that all five of his friends admitted affray, yet Gerrard has managed to squirm out of it. Surely if they’re guilty, so is he?
Gerrard and his friends are guilty of a cowardly attack on a lone man. The verdict given by the jury today is a disgrace to the British justice system.
Don’t get me wrong, I wasn’t expecting jail time for him, but a fine and community service should have been the least he should have expected. I’m actually surprised he had the audacity to claim self defence after having seen the video. But to find out that he was found not guilty is unfathomable.
Liverpool fans: All comments are moderated and your ‘Munich’ jibes will continue to be deleted.






22 Responses to “The law does not apply to Steven Gerrard”