Manchester United Talk banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
113 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Does anyone on here think that this formation is better than a 4-4-2 ? Having seen United adopt that formation last season, i think that helped in our success last year.
 

·
Arse Bandito
Joined
·
1,527 Posts
it was suggested early in the season as the way to get rooney berbatov, tevez and ronaldo in the team

-----carrick--scholes----
ronaldo--tevez--rooney
-------berbatov--------

it could work, but i don't see it happening really. it leaves our team slightly imbalanced in my view, and we shouldn't be trying to force ourselves to get all 4 attackers in the team if it isn't the best idea.

plus united = 442.

http://www.tshirtsunited.com/catalogue/tshirts/philosophy/four-at-the-back-tshirt-small.html
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,730 Posts
I think its a formation made for Europe and the slow build up that is played in them games.

For the premiership you need 2 strikers why because of the pace of the game the ball get knocked into the channels alot .

That the means there is alot of crossed or squared balls into the box I would say you need more than 1 in there otherwise you making the defenders jobs easy .
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top