Manchester United Talk banner
1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,544 Posts
At the very least he should quote the source where he's discovered the article from. It's only respectful when everytime someone post an article from a foreign site & accredit the writer of the specific article & not instead, claim credit for it ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,544 Posts
RedForceRising said:
You gotta start reading ....

the article states at the top
Sunday March 30, 2008
The Observer

What else do you want him to do? Who cares which site he got it from?

And how did he claim credit for it?

Sparkic - excellent post mate. Thanks for sharing and caring : )

Thanks for the link too and don't you dare let geeky smart alecs deter you from posting anything.

You tha man! : )
Well, you do know that all of the threads which were started by him were from another forum right? It's not very nice to duplicate totally identical threads from another different fans forum ;)

Yeap, and I'm truly ashamed of those geeky smart alecs who loves goin' around, slating other people off at the forums. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,544 Posts
RedForceRising said:
Why is it not nice and more importantly what kind of person would care if he got it from another forum?

Maybe I'm too old, but since when has street cred moved into cyber space? We're all lifting information from somewhere else.

If you;re so worried about accrediting original sources, please do so the next time you quote a stat..... sheesh.
Well, if everybody over here juz' sees one article in which he/she is rather interested in & then starts creating irrevelant threads over that particular topic, this forum will be an utter chaos. I could easily create over a hundred threads daily in that way. ;) It doesn't considered spamming right?

And for stats you see...ue can find it easily over any other sites in the whole internet explorer, so there's not a need to quote the source. However, that matter of fact doesn't apply on a sports article which one author puts in their effort, got their rights to be published over a specific site then let the viewers read it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,544 Posts
sparkic said:
Thanks for calming me down mate..Unfortunatley it was not unintentional from RD4L. He has accused me of it before when it was NOT the case and he does it again here. He accused me off having all my threads copied from RedCafe.net which I swear to God is a false fabricated allegation by RD4L. I really get pissed when fools like him lie and try to put me down for no reason.
I'm truly ashamed that you actually resort to disgraceful name-callings!

I thot that only bloody, ill-bred Scousers will resort to dirty name-callings, however looks like I'm wrong though. You'd be better off supporting the likes of £helski, Le'Arse or even worse, BinDippers!


FFS, don't tell me that it's all pure coincidences that RedCafe.net also posted those totally identical threads which you've duplicated over here. Take a look at the timing of when's the article created in RedCafe.net compare to those of yours over here.

And here's the link for the 'Amazing Anderson Article': http://www.redcafe.net/f6/anderson-article-193981/
The thread on Romario retiring: http://www.redcafe.net/f7/romario-retires-193607/
Rafa confirming 3 new signings: http://www.redcafe.net/f9/rafa-confirms-three-signings-193988/
On who's going to get Ronaldinho: http://www.redcafe.net/f9/will-we-get-ronnie-time-193523/
Essien opening his big mouth again: http://www.redcafe.net/f7/essien-open-his-big-mouth-again-193515/

Now, isn't it extremely clear for everybody? It's disgraceful enough to know that there's actually this kind of supporters in our forum...and please don't go around telling others that you belong to our community here!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,544 Posts
sparkic said:
I don't think we will ever get an apology from rdl4. :rolleyes:
Oh sparkic, here's one for you. Not an apology that you've expected but deffo' a reply. I wouldn't really say that I'm that firm or stubborn over my way of thinking. I can change my opinion the odd time though - which's obviously very rare. Sadly, it doesn't appy on this matter...also, it's rd4l ;)

Edited.
I'm sorry :)
Now, over to you mate
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top