Joined
·
2,167 Posts
I've not made a new thread in a while and this aint much of a thread but i was just thinking about the serbs united have signed in Tosic and adem ljacic and how adem (the bigger prospect of the two apparently) is being kept in serbia for whatever reasons. Is it to further continue his development instead of it being stagnated in england in the reserves as he is so young or was it really just about the work permit?
Anyway i was just thinking about what do you think would have been better for anderson? He was becoming a real star player at porto and united took him and basically all the attacking flair he had in him (which made united buy him and everyone aware of him) which made be touted as the next ronaldinho has been taken away. Like we don't simply see it at all and instead he was a box to box midfielder last year and this season is simply a playmaker, just taking the ball and moving it on to the next person.
So this brings me to the question...
Do you think we should possibly have left anderson at porto for another whole season before we brought him to OT?
As in let him stay their and further develop as he looked to be really coming into his own there before bringing him here.
Or do you think united did the right thing in bringing him to OT straight away?
Because he and hargo really kept united solid for a while in the midfield in the first half of the season imo but he seems a different player to one we signed. Very different infact. Also maybe we would not have won the champions league last season if we did not have players like ando to keep the squad strong, so naturally there are arguments for both.
I just wondered what you all thought though and if you have ever thought of this before. The adem staying in serb for the time being and how andersons natural flair is being lost so early in his career got me thinking!!
pz!
Anyway i was just thinking about what do you think would have been better for anderson? He was becoming a real star player at porto and united took him and basically all the attacking flair he had in him (which made united buy him and everyone aware of him) which made be touted as the next ronaldinho has been taken away. Like we don't simply see it at all and instead he was a box to box midfielder last year and this season is simply a playmaker, just taking the ball and moving it on to the next person.
So this brings me to the question...
Do you think we should possibly have left anderson at porto for another whole season before we brought him to OT?
As in let him stay their and further develop as he looked to be really coming into his own there before bringing him here.
Or do you think united did the right thing in bringing him to OT straight away?
Because he and hargo really kept united solid for a while in the midfield in the first half of the season imo but he seems a different player to one we signed. Very different infact. Also maybe we would not have won the champions league last season if we did not have players like ando to keep the squad strong, so naturally there are arguments for both.
I just wondered what you all thought though and if you have ever thought of this before. The adem staying in serb for the time being and how andersons natural flair is being lost so early in his career got me thinking!!
pz!