Still, despite Tevez playing more games, he still hasn't contributed as much to the team as Berbatov. That's the thing you're failing to grasp CROoney.
thats a horrible idea, the fact is no matter if you are the most attack minded midfielder your duty is still to put in some defensive effort as a midfielder, berbatov would do none at all. Maybe he could work as a sort of second striker playing behind a target man upfront, but theres no way he would work as a midfielder.
united only have to pay 22million for tevez, the amount of money they have paid him in wages for the two years will be knocked of the price, only other teams like madrid and from news today liverpool will have to pay the full price for em, even city are after em and chelski...
hes class,sheer class.If you cant see it go and join RAWK.If you need stats to prove it ,go and join RAWK.If you doubthis ability,thats right **** off to RAWK.....
At the end of the day I suppose it's all about what each person defines as a good game.
Would you rather have a striker who makes good passes, touches throught out the game but doesn't make it onto the scoresheet?
Or would you prefer a striker who doesn't really do much, is technically poor, yet always pops up with a goal at the crucial moment?
I like Berbatov so don't take this the wrong way, just stating an opinion, I prefer the technically poor striker who pops up with a goal.
Inzaghi is the perfect example of this. He isn't the most technically proficient striker but his goal return is staggering.
Huntelaar is another good example.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Manchester United Talk
1.5M posts
5.2K members
Since 2006
A forum community dedicated to Manchester United owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Manchester United football, players, reviews, matches, live games, scores, jerseys and much more!