G
Guest
·United suffer one loss after some uncharacteristically bad defending and now everyone is an expert on how to beat United. They forget that we've lost once since December and it wasn't down to being out played, it was down to a big off day from our defence, but according to this tit United have many weaknesses and it's easy to beat us(see image below).
The first part of that apparently is to keep Vidic challenging on the ground. Forget the fact that the mistake he made for Torres' goal happened when the ball was in the air, that's not important, attack him on the ground and you'll beat him, no problem.
The second part is the lack of 'bite' in midfield. In some respects I can agree to this, but the stats they are using are from the beginning of last season (when we won the Premier League and Champions League). What does last season have to do with this? According to the stats, Darren Fletcher makes less than one tackle per half, which we all know on this season's performances is bollocks. He was breaking up attacks left right and centre in the first half of the season. And what would happen to Carrick's stats if they took interceptions into account? I'm pretty sure they'd look a lot better.
Next up in the idiot's guide to beating United is to attack Patrice Evra. He did have a shocker against Aaron Lennon to be fair, but that's partly because Nani was playing on the left with him and doesn't give him as much protection as Park would. Plus Lennon is a brilliant winger and can glide past any defender in the world on one of his good days. Regardless of that, we still didn't concede a goal in the Carling Cup final, so how does that back up the theory at all? They also say that he played badly against Gerrard. Is this the same Gerrard who only touched the ball about ten times on Saturday and was largely anonymous for 90 minutes? He got past Evra once in the entire 90 minutes and he stupidly lunged in and gave away a penalty. It was an uncharacteristic mistake from a player who's been the personification of consistency for the last two years. He's hardly a weak link.
Next is Van der Sar. If you shoot from distance he'll spill the ball and gift you a goal. This is the same Van der Sar that before Sunday had conceded just one league goal since December, breaking a record in the process. None of the goals on Saturday were from spilled balls and the only one I can remember from this season was against Newcastle. His handling from long shots is usually impeccable. He does go through a spell about once a season of flapping the ball out, but it's very rare.
Last but not least. Carlos Tevez. They point to the fact that Carlos Tevez was apparently 'pressed' back towards the halfway line. Is it just me...or does Tevez drop deep whether he's being 'pressed' or not? I mean has this journalist done any research at all? Has he ever watched us play? It doesn't seem like it to me. Let's also not forget that he's omitted Rooney and Ronaldo from his little diagram who stay forward a lot more than Tevez does. He's picked our deepest lying striker in a poor attempt at adding strength to his article.
So there you have it. Follow these steps and you'll take three points off us. Shoddy 'journalism' at its best. I can't believe people get paid to put shit like this together.
http://extras.timesonline.co.uk/pdfs/foilingferguson.pdf
The first part of that apparently is to keep Vidic challenging on the ground. Forget the fact that the mistake he made for Torres' goal happened when the ball was in the air, that's not important, attack him on the ground and you'll beat him, no problem.
The second part is the lack of 'bite' in midfield. In some respects I can agree to this, but the stats they are using are from the beginning of last season (when we won the Premier League and Champions League). What does last season have to do with this? According to the stats, Darren Fletcher makes less than one tackle per half, which we all know on this season's performances is bollocks. He was breaking up attacks left right and centre in the first half of the season. And what would happen to Carrick's stats if they took interceptions into account? I'm pretty sure they'd look a lot better.
Next up in the idiot's guide to beating United is to attack Patrice Evra. He did have a shocker against Aaron Lennon to be fair, but that's partly because Nani was playing on the left with him and doesn't give him as much protection as Park would. Plus Lennon is a brilliant winger and can glide past any defender in the world on one of his good days. Regardless of that, we still didn't concede a goal in the Carling Cup final, so how does that back up the theory at all? They also say that he played badly against Gerrard. Is this the same Gerrard who only touched the ball about ten times on Saturday and was largely anonymous for 90 minutes? He got past Evra once in the entire 90 minutes and he stupidly lunged in and gave away a penalty. It was an uncharacteristic mistake from a player who's been the personification of consistency for the last two years. He's hardly a weak link.
Next is Van der Sar. If you shoot from distance he'll spill the ball and gift you a goal. This is the same Van der Sar that before Sunday had conceded just one league goal since December, breaking a record in the process. None of the goals on Saturday were from spilled balls and the only one I can remember from this season was against Newcastle. His handling from long shots is usually impeccable. He does go through a spell about once a season of flapping the ball out, but it's very rare.
Last but not least. Carlos Tevez. They point to the fact that Carlos Tevez was apparently 'pressed' back towards the halfway line. Is it just me...or does Tevez drop deep whether he's being 'pressed' or not? I mean has this journalist done any research at all? Has he ever watched us play? It doesn't seem like it to me. Let's also not forget that he's omitted Rooney and Ronaldo from his little diagram who stay forward a lot more than Tevez does. He's picked our deepest lying striker in a poor attempt at adding strength to his article.
So there you have it. Follow these steps and you'll take three points off us. Shoddy 'journalism' at its best. I can't believe people get paid to put shit like this together.

http://extras.timesonline.co.uk/pdfs/foilingferguson.pdf