Manchester United Talk banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
Jesus Christ!!

Luka Modric is nothing special. Anderson wipes the floor with him. Sure Modric is good going foward, goot footwork and good passing, but Anderson has all that, infact he is better, and Anderson is also a beast when it comes to defending.

If I see another Luka ****ing Modric thread on this forum Im actually going to punch a hole through my computer. We've got a serious case of the fanboy syndrome.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
STOP TALKING ABOUT LUKA ****ING MODRIC OK?
He is not as good as anderson! I'm tired of everyone saying he is god like. 22 years old? Anderson has 3 years on him and is better. Modric CANNOT play on wing, he is not fast enough. He can only play centre mid, not defensively though mind you as he is practically a dwarf. Manchester United have a wealth of attacking options who are better than Modric so please stop this useless talk.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
CROoney from Dubrovnik said:
so are scholes,rooney and tevez...your point ? you're so aggresive in your attitude .:eek: stop talking people to stop debating. Anderson has played , what 12 good matches and you're saying that he's already better than Luka who's been playing for the last 2 years on the same level . And he wiped the floor ( to use your expression ) with the likes of Riquelme, VDV and Diego when he met them ! As I said - we don't need him at the moment but believe me - he is better than any of our centre midfielders except Scholes and he's not far away of him too. He is definitely scholes' type of player and imo we should sell Carrick and Fletcher ( who I admire for his attitude) and buy Modric. If Carrick's worth 18 mil pounds then Modric is at least 25 ¨! i mean if Skele, for instance can say that ivanovic is better than vididc and the others accept that just because he's signed for chelsea, why should modric be any different only because his club rejected offers from chelsea, spurs, newcastle and co. plus he is the top priority by arsenal fans, then it means, justice, that many people think he's great
I've already said this before that is why I'm annoyed. Yes I am saying Anderson is better. I could play as good as Modric in the Croatian league tbh. Anderson is one of the best midfielders in the premiership at the moment, just watch him when we played Arsenal, he took Cesc out of the game, and Cesc is one of the best in Europe. Modric is 22 years old. Very little development left. In a few years no one will remember Modric, but Anderson is truly one of the midfielding greats.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
CROoney from Dubrovnik said:
it would be great having them both in midfield fighting for their places ;)
No. No it wouldnt. One would succeed and the other would have his career ruined. Thats horrible. Seeing as Anderson is better that would mean your hero turning into a colossal failure.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
CROoney from Dubrovnik said:
nah - i'd take the other was around it would be something similar to cesc - flamini situation - flamini has been given a chance sooner than cesc - then cesc came in and completely outshadowed him with making him the DMF - and that is excactly what Luka would do to Anderson :p :p ;)
You, my friend, are an idiot. Cesc-Flamini situation??? Flamini is shit!!! Cesc is about 5 times better than him, no exaggeration. Flamini knows he is a bench warmer who occasionaly gets games, like Carrick and Fletcher. Modric is physically weak and would be slaughtered in the English game.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
CROoney from Dubrovnik said:
lol, how old are you - 12 ?! grow up lad and learn reading well
lol

Yeah Red I know, got a warning from Red Master, my bad.

and I disagree Jazz. Thats his job, the donkey work. He cant do anything else. Cesc playing poorly is still better than him. Was just pointing out the differences between Cesc-Flamini relationship and the potential Anderson-Modric relationship
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
CROoney from Dubrovnik said:
well it seems that "only the donkey work" was enough to neutralise our entire firepower against milan. you're underestimating the most important position in world football nowadays. Around that position team is built on. Look at the fact when Real's decline and Chelsea's rise begun - with Makeleleswaping clubs . The same problem happened to us when we lost Keano.And milan's gattuso is one of their main players. you can laugh all you want but that's a fact
Your misunderstanding a central midfielders and a defensive midfielders duty. Gattuso, Makelele and Keane were defensive, where as Flamini and Cesc share duties. Cesc is the creative half and Flamini does the running when Diaby and Rosicky are injured or playing elsewhere. I cant believe im replying to a post comparing Mathieu Flamini to Roy Keane.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
CROoney from Dubrovnik said:
I can't believe I'm replying to a person that called me "an idiot". Well, if you read it properly ( i warned you before about that, right ?) you'd see that I compared only their duties, not abilities... And by being cmf ( dmf is still cmf with more defensive duties) their duties can be compared. Everyone here agree's that Flamini is one of the reasons of Arsenal's revival exept you and you're still pushing your head through the wall. Learn to accept facts. Now this Modric thing went to far only because of your aggressive attitude towards the lad, i'm not getting dragged into some useless debate because I don't see a reason for it. For me - Modric is better than Anderson , for you it's vice versa - end off
Good to hear you actually have a basis for your opinions. I wont go into the finer details but whatever. Leave the arguement.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
Jazz 16 said:
Sorry Justice but Im with Crooney on this one. You have the right to your opinion but you will find that most people will think you are wrong (about the Flamini debate)..........

The whole Modric debate is a bit pointless in my eyes, but each to their own i guess. Anderson is new on the scene and to be making comparisons this early is a bit naive. Give him a chance to flourish and play a few games.

At present you could quite easily argue for and against Modric being better or not.
He probably is tbh, but Id rather have Anderson in my squad as he is younger and has much more potential at this point in his career. What Anderson has done so far in his United career has been remarkable but lets see how he gets on after a season or two before we start making comparisons.

he was the new Ronaldihno when he came, which is a joke 'cos he plays nothing like him.
Alrite alrite whatever my opinion that Modric is not worth all the hype seems to be disbounded by the mass so its automatically wrong. Rather alot like all of my statements in this thread. Anderson is 19 and playing AND succeeding at the highest level where Modric is 22 and playing tbh in a sunday league. Modric didnt impress me at the England game and I cant say I've seen more of him, but I will refuse to accept the comment that he is better than Anderson. Modric can play AMF. Anderson can and has played everything from the holding role to upfront and he's done this all in style. In 2 years (maybe less) no one will remember Modric, maybe he will get a move to a "big" club, but its more likely going to be a UEFA cup team rather than a Champ League team, but until then he's just going to fade away into the category "wasted potential". Anderson WILL be one of the best players in Europe, if not the World if he continues playing with this amount of skill. His development will sky rocket and we will have a beast of a midfielder on our hands. An odd mixture of Roy Keane's defensive work and Paul Scholes attacking brilliance. Read 'em and weep Europe.
 

·
has been served
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
CROoney from Dubrovnik said:
now you're just being funny... You said that you hadn't seen luka before that match at wembley ( which was his worst match I have ever seen ) , but then you said that he can only play as an AMF... and you know that by.... ?and your ability to predict a future is unbelievable ( you should cash in on that with ).The way you predictedModric's career path is unique.And let me play a bit of your game - "I can't believe I'm responding to a person who compared Anderson to Scholes and Keane - the guy hasn't played a single whole season for us yet. Sheasy 's first season was remarkable too but he became "only" a utility man. listen - I really like Modric, and i like Anderson too - Anderson CAN become better than Cesc and CAN become one of the best cmf's in the world - somehow this thing became ridiculous Modric vs Anderson debate what makes no sense at all.


No Jazz - way I'm still responding on this silly thread is because we all know Justice hates Modric to guts
Oh fs shut up PLEASE. Stop licking Modric's arsehole and accept that we have no need for him. I accept your train of thought that Modric is better than Anderson, whatever, but how can you possibly suggest we need him. He is not better than Scholes and Scholes already has a deputy in Anderson. Can a mod just lock this thread or something, I think this arguement has petered out into a discussion of how hard I can slate him and how highly CRO can think of him.

From here on in I REFUSE to post in this thread again. I hope it dies and is forgotten.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top