Joined
·
26,045 Posts
Lo and behold, this thread was closed and opened again. Magic....
1. When United played badly, negative comments and sentiments are but only natural and truthful because there are only genuine concerns and care for the team.
2. Whether United win the Double or not at the end of the season is a separate issue altogether with the earlier honest discussions there and then when United played badly.
3. Don't have to spend so much time and effort to dig out posts after posts from genuine members that participated in those honest discussions. It hurts the spirit of a forum and only reflects the level of maturity and the sort of mentality the witch hunter sadly possesses.
P.S.
1. Just not to speak "in riddles" for the sole benefit of Carly, this is parallel to the point I last raised in this thread….. A senior staff of a forum telling members who expressed their honest opinions the following is indeed highly objectionable and does a FORUM no good at all: "None of them are coaches, none of them are qualified in this job and yet they claim to know more than the best of the best."
2. Carly, thanks for reading each and every of my postings; you really flatter me. If you are bringing up about the “guy in another thread somewhere, telling him what he should/should not writeâ€, please also announce that the thread is the one on United being labeled as one-man team. Let the members at least read to understand the circumstance. Don't have to make it so ‘vague' and ‘mysterious' even though it was done and dusted there and then. Honesty is the best policy, remember?
1. When United played badly, negative comments and sentiments are but only natural and truthful because there are only genuine concerns and care for the team.
2. Whether United win the Double or not at the end of the season is a separate issue altogether with the earlier honest discussions there and then when United played badly.
3. Don't have to spend so much time and effort to dig out posts after posts from genuine members that participated in those honest discussions. It hurts the spirit of a forum and only reflects the level of maturity and the sort of mentality the witch hunter sadly possesses.
P.S.
1. Just not to speak "in riddles" for the sole benefit of Carly, this is parallel to the point I last raised in this thread….. A senior staff of a forum telling members who expressed their honest opinions the following is indeed highly objectionable and does a FORUM no good at all: "None of them are coaches, none of them are qualified in this job and yet they claim to know more than the best of the best."
2. Carly, thanks for reading each and every of my postings; you really flatter me. If you are bringing up about the “guy in another thread somewhere, telling him what he should/should not writeâ€, please also announce that the thread is the one on United being labeled as one-man team. Let the members at least read to understand the circumstance. Don't have to make it so ‘vague' and ‘mysterious' even though it was done and dusted there and then. Honesty is the best policy, remember?