Manchester United Talk banner
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,139 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
just looking over the two squads for tomorrows game, i just cant help thinking they have the advantage wih a top class striker comming on while we've got saha :rolleyes: yes i know he can be deverstating on his day but when was his last deverstating day ? i just think Anelka could have a big part to play when he comes on because i cant seem him starting tbh, imagine what could have been with him tevez and rooney ... anyone think we missed a trick with le'sulk ? maybe it was a case of his attitude who knows ? :rolleyes:

Follow, Follow, Follow ! Cos United Are Going to Moscow
 

·
Stretford Ender
Joined
·
2,270 Posts
with current striker situation.......maybe

he aint exactly set stamford bridge alight since his arrival.

Last season we got larsson and he helped immensely. Needed someone similar this time as no ole, no saha for large parts and sold alan smith.

In fact selling rossi was worse than not buying anelka
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,167 Posts
I did think we should have signed a striker in January and was disappointed we did. We did however win the league but yes it could make a difference. Especially if Rooney of Tevez get injured tomorrow. Playing Giggs or Ronaldo upfront is an option of course but i'd rather have a tough CF to bring on. A fit Saha is as good as anyone though. He could damage chelsea, he did it before with a sublime goal.

Signing Anelka, no we shouldn't have. Who wants a sulk in a team? Buying someone else like Podolski - who was out of favour and young. Or Santa Cruz may have been worth it however.
 

·
Proto-Hipster
Joined
·
46,961 Posts
:mad: Jesus
it is stupid he is one of the worst strikers on the face of the earth
rooney played less number of matches and scored more
also tevez too
and ahh who shot the worst penilty ever (aftere terry) anelka
sorry no offence but anelka is for the muppet's
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,139 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
waheyy maybe this was a hoodoo on anelka haha, i stand by the fact that he's a good foward, but i'd have tevez over him every single day of the week, he's absolutely immense
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,139 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
because abo, if im honest i feard what he could do from the bench and believed he would have been and good asset for our club, having seen him last night he doesnt have the commtiment required so really im very happy the we saved 15m it will be better spent elsewhere :D
 

·
Proto-Hipster
Joined
·
46,961 Posts
Drew9 said:
because abo, if im honest i feard what he could do from the bench and believed he would have been and good asset for our club, having seen him last night he doesnt have the commtiment required so really im very happy the we saved 15m it will be better spent elsewhere :D
:) lol.
thanks god we didnt
we are able to spend the cash on a younger lad like Huntelaar
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,467 Posts
Lmao at this thread......
In answer to your question, NO we shouldnt have signed him.
Its pretty evident from last night's miss lol.
Why would he move to Chelsea to be a sub. It baffles me.....


Ps Abo-sort out your sig mate. It's disgracefully big.
 

·
Proto-Hipster
Joined
·
46,961 Posts
Drew9 said:
lol, you do love the hunter dont you, lets hope he's as good as you say if we shell out on him mate
he is way too good better thank ruud
(Huntelaar + Petric + Del piero + Melviskiy + Nesmachny) are my favourate players from outside manutd :eek:
hope we sign one of the or two :)
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
Top