Manchester United Talk banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

11,207 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

Hey big spenders - so refined or profligates extraordinaire? Sportsmail's club-by-club guide to what your team's squad costs

The Barclays Premier League clubs' squads cost a staggering £1.65billion to assemble. That's so much money it's difficult to comprehend - and it doesn't even take the players' wages into account.

The gulf between big spenders Chelsea (£200.7million) and the club who have shelled out the least, Hull City (17.4m), is a whopping £183.3m.

The Tigers doubled their record transfer fee by paying Fulham £5m for Jimmy Bullard last month, yet Chelsea casually splurged the equivalent of City's entire squad on Damien Duff in 2003.

The Blues' owner, Roman Abramovich, also reportedly spent £17m on a Lucian Freud painting, Benefits Supervisor Sleeping (plus £30m on Andriy Shevchenko, who had us all sleeping with his lacklustre performances). Worlds apart? Yes, but only eight Premier League places.

There is a significant gap between the spending of Chelsea, Manchester United, Tottenham, Manchester City and Liverpool, whose squads all cost significantly more than £100m, and the rest of the Premier League clubs.

Judging by the league placings of Spurs and Manchester City, spending obviously doesn't always lead to results.

But which clubs have backed up their purchases with solid performances? Here's Sportsmail's guide to the Premier League cash cows.

1. Chelsea - £200.7m

League position: Third

Roman Abramovich's billions brought Chelsea two league titles, an FA Cup, two league cups and oh-so-close in the Champions League within four years.

But Frank Lampard's £11m move from West Ham, the home-grown talent of John Terry and Michael Ballack's free transfer from Bayern Munich seem shrewd buys compared to the proliferation of £15m-plus players driving their Bentleys into Chelsea's training ground.

2. Manchester United - £189.65m

League position: First

Sir Alex Ferguson's success has been built on players like Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes who learnt their trade at Old Trafford, yet his current squad still cost £189.65m.

The £18.6m United spent on Michael Carrick and the £29.1m for Rio Ferdinand showed Ferguson is prepared to back his instincts, whilst the £12.25m paid to bring Ronaldo to Old Trafford was an absolute steal.

3. Tottenham - £187.2m

League position: 14th

All the gear and no idea springs to mind, but this figure is skewed by the return of Jermain Defoe and Robbie Keane to White Hart Lane.

Even so, £187.2m represents a significant outlay for a Carling Cup trophy and a relegation battle.

Plus Redknapp is always complaining about the relatively small size of his first team squad.

4. Man City - £166.6m

League position: 10th

Yeah, yeah. Manchester City are in the early stages of a 10-year development plan. But £166.6m?

The jury's still out, but Man City's willingness to pay double figures for standard Premier League players seems a touch naive.

5. Liverpool - £140.6m

League position: Second

Fernando Torres' £22m record transfer fee is the most Liverpool have paid for a player and the Spain striker has been worth every penny.

But there are perhaps too many £10m-plus players in Rafa Benitez's squad who haven't set the world on fire, such as £12m Albert Riera.

Home-grown talents Steven Gerrard and Jamie Carragher remain at the heart of Liverpool's title challenge.

6. Newcastle - £81.6m

League position: 15th

Dennis Wise needs to take a long, hard look at himself if he's still in charge of transfers at St James' Park. More than £80m has got Newcastle absolutely nowhere.

7. Aston Villa - £81.55m

League position: Fourth

The £3.5m Villa paid for Emile Heskey sums up the club's general approach to transfer dealings - solid and unshowy.

Martin O'Neill's young guns represent great value for money as they challenge for a Champions League spot.

8. Arsenal - £74.4m

League position: Fifth

A squad comprising immense young talent would perhaps benefit from a few major signings to boost the club's progress, but this is not the Arsenal way. Debt-free and living by their own means, the Arsenal model is to be admired for its sustainability.

9. Sunderland - £68.5m

League position: 13th

Roy Keane spent a lot of cash as he brought top flight football back to Wearside and Sunderland are not quite showing the value for money to repay Niall Quinn's faith.

10. West Ham - £62.25m

League position: Eighth

The Hammers had a very large squad and Zola has been shrewd in off-loading fringe players on loan deals during the transfer window. West Ham's £62.25m squad seems about right for a club of its size.

11. Everton - £60.25m

League position: Sixth

David Moyes has done a magnificent job of making Everton a competitive Premier League outfit on limited resources.

The club's £60m outlay for consistently good Premier League finishes is highly commendable.

12. Portsmouth - £51.6m

League position: 16th

A £50m squad looked a bargain under Redknapp but seems excessive under Tony Adams, especially when you consider it cost almost double that of Stoke City, with whom Pompey are equal on points in the Premier League.

13. Middlesbrough - £47.4m

League position: 19th

At almost £50m Boro's squad should be strong enough to stay up, but it's not looking good.

14. Fulham - £45.2m

League position: Ninth

Another British manager proving prudent in his wheeler-dealings, Roy Hodgson joins David Moyes in doing well with relatively limited resources.

15. Wigan - £38.3m

League position: Seventh

Steve Bruce snapped up Wilson Palacios for £1m and Wigan made a £13m profit on the player when he moved to Spurs earlier this month, representing outstanding business for the Lancashire club.

The Latics were canny in recouping £3.5m for Emile Heskey and are doing extremely well in the Premier League considering the cost of their squad.

16. Bolton - £34.75m

League position: 12th

£12m on Johann Elmander? Hmmmm. Thus said, Bolton are good value if you compare their outlay with that of Newcastle, Sunderland or Middlesbrough.

17. Blackburn - £34.4m

League position: 18th

Roque Santa Cruz is Blackburn's biggest asset and the club did not cash in on him in the transfer window. Good on them.

The big spending days of Premier League success are gone but, if Sam Allardyce can pull the club out of its current slump, Blackburn should continue to do well on a relatively small budget.

18. West Brom - £32.1m

League position: 20th

With the most expensive squad of the three promoted teams, West Brom will perhaps suffer the heaviest blow if they go straight back down.

19. Stoke - £27m

League position: 17th

A £27m squad has held a £140.6m equivalent (Liverpool) to a 0-0 draw twice in the same season. It may not always be pretty, but Stoke are playing within their means.

20. Hull - £17.4m

League position: 11th

A squad that cost less than £10m before January performed far, far beyond anyone's expectations in the first half of the season. Even if the bubble has burst, Hull City deserve to be proud of themselves. Don't forget, the club nearly went bankrupt 10 years ago.

11 Posts
if you wanteed you could spend 100million on 100 players. saying you spent 100 million doesnt mean they were great buys.

tottenham have bough alot of good players. but thats all they are GOOD PLAYERS. man utd buy great players because sir alex will not settle for anything less ,however ,the previous tottenham managers seem to have been willing to settle for less.

lets hope harry will do better.ive a feeling hes the man for the job.

2,740 Posts
Spurs are major underachievers.

Each year everyone tips them to do well (including myself) but each year they fail, it will be interesting to see how they start next season especially with Harry in charge. I think next season they may start to preform, thats as long as they don't complete refresh they're squad again.

2,062 Posts
the arsenal one was very interesting to me. I know and everyone knows they dont have the funds for players and there wages like united the other 3 top teams but they do everything through what they can AND develop players great at the club. A couple of major signings who also come with a good mind and to mix with the talents they could possibly be a threat once again.


Began to read, got as far as.... £12m Albert Riera. :confused:
It was £8m NOT 12m

Looked at a couple of others, they were wrong, decided that someone hasn't done their homework and gave up reading the rubbish.


9,457 Posts
VaVaVoom said:
Spurs have the most expensive defence, yet it's still carp. I could never make out how Newcastle and Spurs spent so much yet still always underachieve.
I agree. You know what would be cheaper then splashing all that cash on Corluka, Woodgate etc?

Spending a bit more cash to bring in a top assistant coach who knows about defending.

Best move West Ham made was listening to Zola & bringing in Steve Clarke from Chelsea.

Teaching your existing players how to defend = cheaper then bringing in a a whole bunch of big name defenders.

United's masseuse
6,296 Posts
dlan4327 said:
I agree. You know what would be cheaper then splashing all that cash on Corluka, Woodgate etc?

Spending a bit more cash to bring in a top assistant coach who knows about defending.

Best move West Ham made was listening to Zola & bringing in Steve Clarke from Chelsea.

Teaching your existing players how to defend = cheaper then bringing in a a whole bunch of big name defenders.
Yeah i never agreed with them when they were selling their key players; Defoe, Keane n Berba. They should have enhanced their squad, but not renew it for gods sake !
They`re lucky they got Defoe and Keane back, very very lucky. I expect them to improve and this Summer, instead to sell and buy new players they should enhance what they`ve got. And i`ll tell you, they`ll be up there next season.
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.